On Saturday morning, Pyro was the consensus favorite to win the Kentucky Derby, Visionaire was a contender moving forward toward May 3, Cool Coal Man appeared to be trainer Nick Zito’s most dangerous weapon and Big Truck was the other promising three-year-old Derby prospect in Barclay Tagg’s barn.
After the Blue Grass Stakes run over Polytrack at Keeneland, in which Visionaire finished fifth, 6 ¼ lengths behind Monba, with Cool Coal Man, Pyro and Big Truck ninth, tenth and eleventh beaten by 10 ¾, 11 ½ and 11 ¾ lengths respectively, they share a glaring lack of one of the essential qualifications of a potential Kentucky Derby winner – a good race at nine furlongs in the final prep.
Only Visionaire, last of 12 early, managed to close any ground in the Blue Grass. Cool Coal Man, who tracked a soft pace to the stretch turn, backed up. Pyro and Big Truck may as well have had their final Derby prep on a treadmill. Gayego, meanwhile, wisely sent from California to Arkansas to answer the question of the translation of form from a synthetic to dirt surface, answered in the affirmative with a very solid effort in the Arkansas Derby. Z Fortune’s unsuccessful late bid-hung effort at Oaklawn suggests that nine furlongs may have been beyond his range but at least that race served its purpose.
So, either Monba, who is without a stakes win on dirt, was underrated or he is this year’s Dominican. The latter is likely the correct answer. And if Pyro, Visionaire, Cool Coal Man or Big Truck makes an impact in Louisville, it will be the result of an extraordinary training effort since none is likely to have benefitted from the experience in Lexington.
It will be interesting to see the various rankings of this week. The only certainty is that Big Brown‘s position was strengthened by his absence from the Blue Grass. Here’s one:
Big Brown
Tale of Ekati
Gayego
War Pass
Z Fortune
Recapturetheglory
Colonel John
Smooth Air
Tomcito
Pyro
Kentucky Derby betting
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)










5 comments:
I agree whole-heartedly with your Blue Grass review, and I just made a post that supports several of your statements. Would you mind reading it over and letting me know what you think? I'd really like your opinion.
http://racehorsegirl.com/2008/04/is-polytrack-a-valid-indicator-of-ability/
Dutrow and IEAH have been Oscar, Oscar, Oscar type hot. They beat the Middle East, Florida, and now Keeneland. No doubt poor ol' John Veitch can't catch them in the Derby or anything they put on the under card. If you can't catch em I mean beat em...join em...Big Brown should win the Derby by 5 and break Secretariat's track record.
So based on what you and Paul believe, we should just dig up the Poly at Keeneland and elsewhere and revert to slop fests where the potential for breakdowns is higher just so we can have a "true" picture of ability leading up to the Derby and other big races? Seems quite illogical.
Sinister Minister and Bandini won the final two Blue Grass Stakes on the old Keeneland dirt - check and see how they did in their Derbies compared to Dominican.
Let's allow the market to define what happens here. If people don't want to go to Keeneland, Woodbine etc. and/or the ignore the signals from a simulcast perspective that will say a great deal. If more owners decide that the surfaces are wrong - as Zayat did last summer at Del Mar - that will send a strong message.
But as long as we have a third surface that attracts large fields and a high level of betting interest, let's allow the process to continue.
I'll handicap on whatever surfaces they run on - I'm most concerned that when I take people to the races, I don't have to explain why there are only four horses in a race or why a horse had to be put down. Obviously there are other factors at play here - a few tracks have taken on one major issue. At SA it hasn't worked out so well. At Kee it seems to be working out fine. Let's allow the process to continue.
It doesn't take a daily reader to determine what Paul thinks of the synthetic surfaces - but I am a bit mystified by the lower ranking of Colonel John. Below Recapturetheglory?
I think Colonel John needs to be in the top three along with Big Brown and Tale of Ekati. He's a big strider that will like the likely fast fractions.
I will be most interested in Paul's breakdown of the race once the post draw occurs.
Paul, your response (inserted below)to racehorsegirl's post on Poly is starting make me think that you are recruiting more naysayers to spout your overly critical opinion on artificial surface racing.
Your desire to embrace the status quo and/or the past is strange.
- Getting rid of Poly because the results don't fit your definition of what "should" happen in Derby preps.
- Not allowing VLTs at Belmont Park because of the historical significance that the track holds in racing history despite that no one goes there in any decent quantities with the exception of Belmont Stakes Day and possibly the JC Gold Cup.
- Not providing handicapping opinions on the Aqueduct Inner Dirt races because you cannot find "worthy plays".
It's too bad that you waste your considerable articulate journalistic abilities espousing such narrow-minded and archaic opinions.
Paul Moran // Apr 13, 2008 at 3:26 pm
On the money. Nice work.
Post a Comment